Written by Laurence Brahm - Published by South China Morning Post on 06/27/2006

When the long anticipated the train service to Lhasa begins on Saturday, it will affect the entire Himalayan region, not only Tibet. So, Beijing must recognise that the area possesses a vast and important resource – its unique topography and culture.

The development challenge is to promote and make the most of the coming changes, without damaging the delicate ecology.

Nepal’s consul-general to Lhasa, Leela Mani Paudyal, said that while the Himalayan region possesses “one of the world’s most precious and valuable resources, it has some of the poorest people due to the lack of capacity to utilize these resources”.

Ultimately, carefully planned and managed tourism will be the basis of development there. Government investment in basic transport infrastructure will have its positive and negative effects: it will promote the economic development of logical people; but it will attract a large number of visitors who may damage its potential for sustainable development.

“The planet must bear in mind that the ecology of this region is the most fragile [in the world],” said Mr Paudyal. Potential benefits will accrue from protecting it. To destroy the environment would kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.”

Several steps must taken to assure the sustainable development of the region in the interest of the people living on the both sides of the Nepal-China border, he said.

First, protecting the world’s most fragile ecosystem require advance planning. Second, people will come to this region to experience its natural environment, not necessarily to enjoy luxury. So destroying the environment to built massive hotel projects and massive tourist facilities - as in the rest of China – would hamper the long-term, sustainable development of tourism.

Third, the capacity of indigenous people should be strengthened by developing local resources. The Himalayan region of Nepal and China possesses sites sacred to both Buddhism and Hinduism. That heritage provides cultural and religious attractions, but it must be developed sensitively. For example, thousands of pilgrims ant to visit Tibet’s Mount Kailash, which is sacred to Buddhists, Hindus, followers of Tibet’s indigenous Bon religion and India’s Jain faith.

But complicated travel procedures, physical dangers and low service standards discourage many. They could be encouraged to visit this spectacular, remote region if emergency medical care, for example, were provided along the route.

The first step is to develop infrastructure jointly, to help small groups travel for cultural and ecological tourism. The second is easing border-crossing restrictions through a joint co-ordinating body. A visionary plan for trans-Himalayan development and more China-’Nepal dialogue are needed.

But co-operation is not always easy. The vital; bus link between Katmandu and Lhasa is not functioning well as a joint enterprise, so private cars ply the route, instead. The Chinese claim there’s not business to support the bus route; the Nepalese say Chinese red tape hobbles the business.

Communities on both sides of the border would benefit from expanded trade in cottage-industry products. While these small businesses may generate only a fraction of the gross domestic product, they employ people at the grass-root level. In the 1960s they were the backbone of the Nepal’s economy, but are now in decline.

So development must be rethought, sensitized and localized to provide the most benefit to indigenous people. The governments of China and Nepal must work together to monitor the protection of the environment and sensitivity of new infrastructure projects. Otherwise, after the train start rolling into Lhasa, it may soon be too late.

Laurence Brahm is a global activist, international mediator, political columnist and author. He is the leading advocate of a fresh development paradigm - The Himalayan Consensus - an innovative approach to development.

Back to Top